<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intraday Commentary ~ 11/7/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=intraday-commentary-11708</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-1/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9718</guid>
		<description>CDS have pretty much been nullified by the Treasury...just look at the auction results...for every party with a positive claim, chances are they are hedged the other way with an outgoing claim. Maybe a bit simplistic...but thats my thought...if they allow the domino affect then literally its a global derivative blowup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CDS have pretty much been nullified by the Treasury&#8230;just look at the auction results&#8230;for every party with a positive claim, chances are they are hedged the other way with an outgoing claim. Maybe a bit simplistic&#8230;but thats my thought&#8230;if they allow the domino affect then literally its a global derivative blowup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikas</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9714</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9714</guid>
		<description>We did see a big drop when Obama was speaking.. may be the rally was to pose a good picture for him.. U know usually when Bush speaks publically.. market falls..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did see a big drop when Obama was speaking.. may be the rally was to pose a good picture for him.. U know usually when Bush speaks publically.. market falls..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gr</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9712</link>
		<dc:creator>gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9712</guid>
		<description>HUI up 4.2% while GDX down 0.6%. what&#039;s going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HUI up 4.2% while GDX down 0.6%. what&#8217;s going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9711</guid>
		<description>Craig, if the huge inverse H&amp;S were to come to fruition, would you know what the approximate SPX equivalent of the SPY neckline would be?  Does about ~1,012 sound reasonable?  And, even if it were to happen, all 3 EW scenarios would still remain valid, would that be correct?  TIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, if the huge inverse H&amp;S were to come to fruition, would you know what the approximate SPX equivalent of the SPY neckline would be?  Does about ~1,012 sound reasonable?  And, even if it were to happen, all 3 EW scenarios would still remain valid, would that be correct?  TIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mav</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9709</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9709</guid>
		<description>On a lighter note, GS has been trading with oil. Even the astro charts on them both are similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a lighter note, GS has been trading with oil. Even the astro charts on them both are similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9708</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thorough reply, mav.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thorough reply, mav.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mav</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9707</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9707</guid>
		<description>I meant AFAM long, not AFM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant AFAM long, not AFM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mav</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9706</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9706</guid>
		<description>My horizon is days to one week maximum. I do have swing trades which are of much larger duration from a month ago - one is UNG:USO  and NKE puts (from 58) and AFM long (48).

My call in the morning for a period of churn and then a late surge was strictly based on technicals  and on astro charts (these unfortunately I cannot reveal).

I never to rationalize price moves. I don&#039;t know the reason for the limitless infusion of capital. All I know is it came in last week.  I cannot speculate who is buying or what is buying. Trading needs to be about being mechanical. 
There were lots of my astro indicators, pointing to a mixed to slightly bullish day.

As for pure technical indicators and my long bias, I don&#039;t want to short a market which has fallen for 2 days and still has its 20d which turned up or facing upwards. This is not a percentage trade. You will not get any traction on your shorts.

For monday, lets wait for confirmation or resumption of the down/up move, I will jump in then. I will let you know if my proprietary indicators indicate a trend. They are still in a period of churn, with a slight bullish bias. Also SSRI is setting up nicely. Monday or tuesday could be the blast in SSRI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My horizon is days to one week maximum. I do have swing trades which are of much larger duration from a month ago &#8211; one is UNG:USO  and NKE puts (from 58) and AFM long (48).</p>
<p>My call in the morning for a period of churn and then a late surge was strictly based on technicals  and on astro charts (these unfortunately I cannot reveal).</p>
<p>I never to rationalize price moves. I don&#8217;t know the reason for the limitless infusion of capital. All I know is it came in last week.  I cannot speculate who is buying or what is buying. Trading needs to be about being mechanical.<br />
There were lots of my astro indicators, pointing to a mixed to slightly bullish day.</p>
<p>As for pure technical indicators and my long bias, I don&#8217;t want to short a market which has fallen for 2 days and still has its 20d which turned up or facing upwards. This is not a percentage trade. You will not get any traction on your shorts.</p>
<p>For monday, lets wait for confirmation or resumption of the down/up move, I will jump in then. I will let you know if my proprietary indicators indicate a trend. They are still in a period of churn, with a slight bullish bias. Also SSRI is setting up nicely. Monday or tuesday could be the blast in SSRI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9705</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9705</guid>
		<description>GS didn&#039;t participate in the rally.  It actually closed at a 52 week low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GS didn&#8217;t participate in the rally.  It actually closed at a 52 week low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://www.focalequity.com/2008/11/07/intraday-commentary-11708/comment-page-3/#comment-9704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=9034#comment-9704</guid>
		<description>Scary...
I was about to post the same... Since two of us agree, it probably will go up. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary&#8230;<br />
I was about to post the same&#8230; Since two of us agree, it probably will go up. <img src='http://www.focalequity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

